Recent findings from the 2025 State of Our Schools survey conducted by the Australian Education Union reveal that 85% of teachers say they spend too much, or far too much, time dealing with student behavioural issues.1
So, what policies and processes would help schools to address this challenge?
As all principals, teachers, and school staff know, a precondition for a student’s education is stability, which teachers and staff maintain through providing each student with structure and routine within clear boundaries.
The stability created can be disrupted by students, in the form of disruptive behaviours. These behaviours can be minor (like talking during class) but also can include unsafe conduct like physical and verbal aggression and dangerous behaviour.2 School staff routinely and expertly deal with the spectrum of behaviours that disrupt the wellbeing of others. It is on responding to the violent behaviours (physical or verbal) that Principals seek advice on their powers and duties.
Restoring and maintaining a stable learning environment is not only educationally sound, but may be a duty under the Work Health Safety Uniform Law (WHS Uniform Law), and part of discharging the Principal’s common law duty of care.
The Law
Principals have duties under the WHS Uniform Law to ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, that staff and ‘other persons’ (including students) are not exposed to health and safety risks arising from work carried out as part of the operation of the school.3 In 2023, the legislation was broadened to include protection against psychosocial hazards. As such, schools have a duty to manage hazards and risks to teachers, students, and other staff members’, physical, as well as psychosocial, health and safety.4 Examples of psychosocial hazards include stress, fatigue, bullying, violence, aggression, harassment and burnout, which can be harmful to the health of workers and compromise their wellbeing.5
The Risk
The impacts of behavioural issues are significant, for example:
- 24.5% of teachers feel unsafe at work citing student behaviour and violence being key reasons why.6
- 41.6% of principals, assistant principals, and deputy principals report being subjected to physical violence.7
Discharging the duty of care
Schools are familiar with the common law duty of care but should be aware of their duties under WHS Uniform Law. Schools should apply policies, rules, processes and behavioural consequences to allow students to be confident about everything that’s going on and what’s expected of them. Students learn to trust the rules, their teachers, and peers. This in turn maintains a safe physical and psychological workplace and learning environment.
Schools should take reasonable steps to not expose persons to health and safety risks arising from the school environment. This can be done by:
- including in the enrolment agreement conditions allowing for behaviour management, including suspension and termination;
- conducting risk assessments that include any psychosocial hazards in response to student behaviour, including before students return to school after exclusions: and
- publishing clear policies for responding to student behaviour, including potential consequences.
Discrimination risk
Behavioural issues may sometimes be a manifestation of disability. In these cases, schools may find themselves in a position where a student with disability’s disruptive behaviour is posing a risk to the safety of staff, students, and themselves.
In addressing student behaviour, schools must be mindful of their obligations under the Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) and the Equal Opportunity Act 1984 (WA) and the equivalent legislation in other jurisdictions.
The 2003 High Court case of Purvis v New South Wales (Department of Education and Training) 8 established that when a student with disability engages in violent behaviour, the comparator is a student without disability who engages in the same behaviour. This means that when dealing with students with disability, a school is required to apply the same rules, and respond in the same way, to the behaviour as they would with a student without disability.
While this decision remains controversial, it recognises the obligations schools have in balancing inclusiveness with safety and the stability of the classroom.
Lavan comment
School staff are experts in managing student behaviour. This inherent skill must be consistently applied within a framework of enrolment agreements, policies, consultation with parents and specialists as appropriate, and supported by ongoing professional development.
These strategies lead to a consistent, non-discriminatory approach to addressing student behaviour while discharging legal obligations.
Lavan has extensive experience in tailoring enrolment agreements, policies and procedures for schools as well as staff training in most Australian jurisdictions.
If your school requires advice on managing students with behavioural issues, WHS obligations, or any other issue involving schools, please contact our Employment, Safety and Education team for tailored legal guidance.
Disclaimer
The information contained in this publication does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. You should seek legal advice in relation to any particular matter you may have before relying or acting on this information. The Lavan team are here to assist.
Footnotes
[1] <https://www.aeufederal.org.au/news-media/news/2025/complex-needs-increase-load>.
[2]..
[3] Workplace Health and Safety Act 2020 (WA), s 19.
[4] WorkSafe, Psychosocial hazards in the workplace, code of practice (2025), 1.3.
[5] Ibid, 1.1.
[6] Longmuir, F., Gallo Cordoba, B., Phillips, M., Allen, K.A. & Moharami, M. (2022). Australian Teachers’ Perceptions of their Work in 2022. Monash University. https://doi.org/10.26180/21212891.
[7] See, S-M., Kidson, P., Marsh, H., & Dicke, T. (2023). The Australian Principal Occupational Health, Safety and Wellbeing Survey (IPPE Report). Sydney: Institute for Positive Psychology and Education, Australian Catholic University.
[8] [2003] HCA 62.
Related Publications
The fine line between classroom discipline and teacher’s misconduct
Closing loopholes crack down on underpayments and wage theft (1 January 2025) and key employment updates for the new financial year
Stay up to date with Lavan
"*" indicates required fields